The Santiago Theory is one of those concepts that really "feels true" to me. Something that can be called cognitive, "couples to its environment structurally i.e. through recurrent interactions, each of which triggers structural changes in the system," & "intelligence is manifest in the richness and flexibility of an organism's structural coupling." What beautiful synthesis of so many ideas!
Here's a link to a discussion that sums up a lot of what I have to say on this topic. It was written by my boyfriend, so while I can't take credit for it, we've certainly talked about a lot of these issues over the past 5 years.
My thoughts are a bit scattered here at the end of finals week, but the article my small group focused on last week (Memory: From Mind to Molecules) elicited feelings that have been common for me in my study of TCM. The reactions I have are gratitude and comfort, wonder and curiosity. Reaction to a few specific quotes:
"The hippocampus and its associated components in the medial temporal lobe... bind together the sources of our scattered life experiences into a single fabric of long-term conscious declarative memory that becomes the thread weaving our personal identity," & "...states of psychobiological arousal that lead to the transcription of genes, their translation into proteins and neurogenesis..." We are truly autopoetic!
"Consciousness may be the fragile thread of civilization from an outer perspective, but it is more like an intense laser beam focusing and fusing the biological basis of human experience from the inner perspective." This brought to mind the concept of eschatology, the "end" driven idea of how reality unfolds, which does not resonate with me, but then I thought about the fact that every little choice, every movement of each atom effects the subsequent moment, and that brought me back to happier conceptual territory
As humans we have done all kinds of things to "evoke the sense of wonder that nurtures imagination and psychological transformation," and lo and behold, we were creating ourselves. In lieu of closing words of my own, here's something else that came up for me in class last week, as I had read it earlier that day:
Studying the emotion of "elevation"
UC Berkeley psychologist Dacher Keltner is a pioneer in the study of an emotion known as "elevation," characterized by a "a feeling of spreading, liquid warmth in the chest and a lump in the throat." (Not be confused with heartburn.) Triggering that emotion in the lab is challenging. His research group's latest approach though is to play their subjects Barack Obama's victory speech. (My IFTF colleague Jason Tester has dubbed the impact of Obama on people's brains "neurobama.") Slate has a great profile of "elevation" research, including the work of moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of The Happiness Hypothesis. I also look forward to reading Keltner's forthcoming book on the subject of "elevation," titled Born To Be Good: The Science of a Meaningful Life (which is not an Obama biography). From Slate:Elevation has always existed but has just moved out of the realm of philosophy and religion and been recognized as a distinct emotional state and a subject for psychological study. Psychology has long focused on what goes wrong, but in the past decade there has been an explosion of interest in "positive psychology"—what makes us feel good and why. University of Virginia moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who coined the term elevation, writes, "Powerful moments of elevation sometimes seem to push a mental 'reset button,' wiping out feelings of cynicism and replacing them with feelings of hope, love, and optimism, and a sense of moral inspiration...."
We come to elevation, Haidt writes, through observing others—their strength of character, virtue, or "moral beauty." Elevation evokes in us "a desire to become a better person, or to lead a better life."